Skip to content
Indus River Basin

Indus River Basin

  • Home
  • Indus River Basin
    • Introduction
    • Surface Water Resources
      • Eastern Rivers
        • Sutlej River
        • Beas River
        • Ravi River
      • Western Rivers
        • Chenab River
        • Indus River
        • Jhelum River
        • Kabul River
        • Minor Rivers
          • Astore River
          • Chitral River
          • Dras River
          • Gilgit River
          • Gomal River
          • Hunza River
          • Kurram River
          • Shyok River
          • Haro River
          • Soan River
          • Suru River
          • Swat River
          • Tochi River
          • Zanskar River
          • Zoab River
    • Doabs
      • Bari Doab
      • Bist Jalandhar Doab
      • Chaj Doab
      • Rachna Doab
      • Sindh-Sagar Doab
    • Delta
    • Groundwater Resources
  • Treaties
    • Inter-Dominion Agreement – 1948
      • Introduction
      • History
      • Negotiations
      • Outcome
    • Indus River Basin Treaty – 1960
      • Introduction
        • Articles
        • Annexes
        • Addendums
      • History
      • Negotiations
      • Outcome
      • Financial Arrangements
      • Implementation
      • Disputes
      • Resolution
  • Indus Irrigation System
    • Upper Indus Plain
      • Canals
        • Upper Bari Doab Canal
      • Barrages
      • Dams
    • Lower Indus Plain
      • Lower Bari Doab Canal
  • Groundwater Resources
  • Hydrometeorology
  • Climate Change
  • Media
    • Press Articles
    • YouTube
    • Reports
  • Academic Resources
    • Books
    • Lectures
  • Maps
  • Videoconferences
  • Toggle search form

Inter-Dominion Agreement – 1948

Inter-Dominions Conference, 1-3 May, 1948, Delhi, 

The Delegation for Inter-Dominions Conference held from 1-3 May, 1948 in Delhi, Pakistan, instead of representing by the Prime Minister, headed by Malik Ghulam Muhammad (1895–1956), Finance Minister, accompanied by two senior ministers from west Punjab including Shaukat Hayat Khan (1915-1998) and Mumtaz Daultana(1916-1995) to negotiate the canal water dispute with India. The composition of the Pakistani delegation exhibited a lowering down the representational level for IDC-Delhi. Whereas, Prime Minister Nehru, represented India along with East Punjab Irrigation Minister Sardar Swarn Singh (1907-1994) and Narhar Vishnu Gadgil (1896-1966), Minister for Public Works and Rehabilitation, assisted by Gopalsawami Ayyangar(1882-1953) and Dr Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar (1891-1956). East Punjab, maintained their position and insisted on recognizing their “sovereign rights” as well as acknowledgement of West Punjab that it had “no right” to the waters of three eastern rivers. India categorically refused to release water to west Punjab unless accepted the two narrated conditions. N.V.Gadgil proposed Pakistan to make alternate water supply arrangements as India intended to reduce water flow in future to irrigate its own barren lands. He offered a five-year grace period to Pakistan for making necessary alternate water arrangements. 

Malik Ghulam Mhummad highlighted the critical issue of riparian rights, stressing that stopping water would harm the economy and food supply of West Punjab. Malik Ghulam Mohammed expressed regret over the uncompromising legal interpretation of Dr. B.R.Ambedkar and insisted on signing a “provisional agreement” without prejudice to legal claims. On deepening of negotiation impasse, Lord Mountbatten, Governor General, on request, intervened after consulting with Jawaharlal Nehru, and India tabled a draft “statement” before the Pakistani delegation, demanding that for the restoration of the flow of water, they have to sign the “draft statement” without changing “a word or comma.” 

The inflexible Indian position of “sovereign rights” on canal water created serious impediments for Pakistan to continue negotiations to a fruitful end. To address the India position Pakistan offered to refer the matter of sovereign right to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for adjudication. Prime Minister Nehru categorically opposed the Pakistani idea and stated that “To think, ab initio, of a third party will lessen the sense of responsibility of the judges and will also be a confession of our continued dependence on others. This would hardly be becoming of a proud and self-respecting independent nation” thus set aside a genuine need of legal interpretation to emotional national pride. 

Whereas, Sardar Vallabhai Patel (1875-1950), in a letter (dated 25 February, 1950) addressed to Pandit Nehru opined that Pakistan wanted to make canal water a complicated case by proposing to take the matter to ICJ, therefore, if at all a choice has to be made, I would rather have arbitration than the International Court of Justice. In regard to the former, at least we shall have our own man on the bench who might influence the arbitrator by his learning and grasp of matters, as was the case recently in regard to the Bagge Tribunal; once we submit the case to the International Court of Justice, we just become helpless.

The outcome of Inter-Dominion Conference is summarized herewith that: 

a. India agreed to: 

● Restore canal water supplies to West Punjab (Pakistan) for a “certain period”.( extent of period not specified) 

● Progressively reduce supply of water to West Punjab, allowing Pakistan to explore alternative water sources to replace the supply. 

The amount of canal water to be released from UBDC, calculated during the IDC-Delhi, from East Punjab, India to West Punjab, Pakistan was as followings: 

CanalRD PointCUSEC
1Lahore Branch RD.197630 623.0 
2Main Branch Lower RD.250563 1382.0 
3Pull Disty.RD.74595 24.0 
4Rai Minor of Pull Disty. RD.22916 16.0 
5Kohali Disty. RD.67245 52.0 
6Khalra Disty. RD.26900 17.0 
7Buchar Khana Dist RD.15705 363.0
TOTAL2,477